An argument against the benefits of immunization

A small, very vocal, minority.

An argument against the benefits of immunization

Only clean water, also considered to be a basic human right, performs better. How one addresses the antivaccine movement has been a problem since the time of Jenner. The best way in the long term is to refute wrong allegations at the earliest opportunity by providing scientifically valid data.

This is easier said than done, because the adversary in this game plays according to rules that are not generally those of science.

This issue will not be further addressed in this paper, which aims to show how vaccines are valuable to both individuals and societies, to present validated facts, and to help redress adverse perceptions. Without doubt, vaccines are among the most efficient tools for promoting individual and public health and deserve better press.

While eradication may be an ideal goal for an immunization programme, to date only smallpox has been eradicated, allowing discontinuation of routine smallpox immunization globally. Potentially, other infectious diseases with no extrahuman reservoir can be eradicated provided an effective vaccine and specific diagnostic tests are available.

Eradication requires high levels of population immunity in all regions of the world over a prolonged period with adequate surveillance in place. OPV-caused paralytic disease, directly or by reversion to virulence, and persistent vaccine-virus excretion in immunodeficient individuals are problems yet to be solved.

In four of six WHO regions, substantial progress has been made in measles elimination; transmission no longer occurs indigenously and importation does not result in sustained spread of the virus. Combined measles, mumps and rubella MMR vaccine could also eliminate and eventually eradicate rubella and mumps.

Already, elimination of measles from the Americas, and of measles, mumps and rubella in Finland has been achieved, providing proof in principle of the feasibility of their ultimate global eradication.

Control of mortality, morbidity and complications For the individual Efficacious vaccines protect individuals if administered before exposure.

Pre-exposure vaccination of infants with several antigens is the cornerstone of successful immunization programmes against a cluster of childhood diseases. Complications such as congenital rubella syndrome, liver cirrhosis and cancer caused by chronic hepatitis B infection or neurological lesions secondary to measles or mumps can have a greater long-term impact than the acute disease.

Such breakthroughs are either primary — due to vaccine failure — or secondary. In such cases, the disease is usually milder than in the non-vaccinated. In a German efficacy study of an acellular pertussis vaccine, vaccinated individuals who developed whooping cough had a significantly shorter duration of chronic cough than controls.

Milder disease in vaccinees was also reported for rotavirus vaccine. Some vaccines protect against infection as well. Sterilizing immunity may wane in the long term, but protection against disease usually persists because immune memory minimizes the consequences of infection.

An argument against the benefits of immunization

Source drying Source drying is a related concept to herd protection. If a particular subgroup is identified as the reservoir of infection, targeted vaccination will decrease disease in the whole population.

In North Queensland, Australia, there was a high incidence of hepatitis A in the indigenous population. Vaccination of indigenous toddlers, with catch-up up to the sixth birthday, had a rapid and dramatic impact in eliminating the disease in the indigenous population and in the much larger non-indigenous population who were not vaccinated across the whole of Queensland.

Chronic hepatitis B infection leads to liver cancer.

The CDC () states, “Public health department’s recommendations for immunization plans and practices represent a recognizable balancing of risks and benefits.” Such was the case with smallpox and oral polio vaccines in the United States. Parental refusal of vaccines is a growing a concern for the increased occurrence of vaccine preventable diseases in children. A number of studies have looked into the reasons that parents refuse, delay, or are hesitant to vaccinate their child(ren). Source: The Impact of Vaccines in the United States. These drops in disease rates are primarily thanks to vaccination, not sanitation or improved hygiene. (If that were the case, all diseases would start declining around the same time.) While the diseases we vaccinate against have declined, they haven’t disappeared.

Vaccination against such pathogens should prevent the associated cancer as already observed for hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan, China. However, the mortality and morbidity prevented translates into long-term cost savings and potential economic growth.

Globally, the savings from vaccines were estimated by Ehreth in to be of the order of tens of billions of US dollars of direct savings. Savings are enhanced if several antigens are delivered in a single vaccine. Combination vaccines bring the added benefit of better compliance, coverage, and injection safety.

Introduction of a new antigen is facilitated with combination vaccines, ensuring early high coverage by maintaining previous immunization schedules, without compromising and sometimes improving immunogenicity and reactogenicity.

Staphylococcus aureus is viewed as a better long-term option to control the problem of increasing resistance.We will write a custom essay sample on The Importance of Childhood Immunizations specifically for you for only $ $/page.

This seemed like too much of an argument for me to tackle during an office visit. artificial stimulation of the body’s defenses against each disease.

Ideally, this is done without causing any symptoms or. In fact, all three diseases have seen a resurgence in the past decade. In Minnesota suffered a measles outbreak: in a Somali-American community with previously high vaccination rates, concerns about autism led parents to refuse the MMR vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella, and measles spread among the unvaccinated.

The % mercury by weight thimerosal, was used as a vaccine preservative since the s, and was viewed as a safe, reliable, and somewhat drab defender against bacterial and fungal contamination until June of , when the Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) completes an 18month inquiry into the risks and benefits of.

The key facts parents need to know, though, are that vaccines prevent potentially fatal diseases, that vaccines have a high degree of safety, and that their safety is constantly evaluated and.

An Argument Against the Benefits of Immunization PAGES 2. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: vaccines, benefits of immunization, vaccination on children, mctaggart.

Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. Vaccines can increase life expectancy by protecting against diseases against which one would not expect benefit.

Elderly individuals given influenza vaccine in the USA had approximately 20% less chance of suffering cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease and 50% lower risk of mortality from all causes compared to their unvaccinated.

Straight Talk about Vaccination - Scientific American